What about using a jms flow configured at specfic points in your flow to control where the load balancing can occur ? Using it at each step is quite inefficient imho ...
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a cluster of servicemix nodes with a homogenous deployment of > endpoints across the cluster. I have SEDA and JMSFlow enabled on all nodes in > the cluster. I would like to ensure one of my EIP Pipeline transformers uses > JMSFlow instead of SEDA to explicitly force JMS-based load balancing to occur > across the cluster. I don't see a mechanism currently in servicemix-eip to > provide this level of control. Am I correct? Assuming I am correct, would it > make sense to add a "clustered" attribute to the EIP Pipeline endpoint, for > example, to ensure that the transformer MessageExchange gets created with the > "clustered" QOS set so that JMSFlow gets used rather than SEDA? Let me know > if this makes sense. > > - Ron > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
