No reasons, the only reason would be if we have transactions in smx3, but it's difficult given it's file and ftp.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, rgavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Once async is supported, is there any reason to maintain the synchronous > version? > > - Ron > > > gnodet wrote: >> >> No reason afaik. It should be done with async instead. >> >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Is there a reason why the servicemix-file poller currently only supports >>> sending message exchanges synchronously? If not, then I will open a JIRA >>> to implement async support and make sync/async behavior configurable. >>> >>> - Ron >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-file-poller---async-support-tp18256449p18262931.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
