When comparing smx-eip and smx-camel routing between jbi endpoints, what are the differences in terms of sync and async behavior and scalability? I know smx-eip has extensive support for async invocations between endpoints. Does smx-camel by default provide comparable async support?
If there are differences between the two, it would be helpful to describe such differences in a faq so that folks who are considering "upgrading" from smx-eip to smx-camel are informed. Thanks, - Ron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/smx-camel-routing---sync-vs.-async-routing-tp18567886p18567886.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
