Le 6 août 08 à 20:28, "Manuel EVENO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Benoît Clouet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>wrote:
In fact, in an enterprise development I fond much simpler and more
robust
to have to deal with files than with a db.
For example, how do you delete some old aged exchanges traces with
the
embedded DB to avoid fs saturation and some loss of performance? I
suppose I
have to write some java program to do so what I don't want to.
Don't you think you will need to make a development to handle the
file purge
(probably a shell-script)
The db purge can be done with shell scripts too ...
For sure I will have to write a shell script for doing so. But FS
access seems much simpler than DB access, at least when done by our
overbooked IT operation guys.
Moreover, I had some bad experience while doing some tests on
servicemix
examples. Servicemix refused some time to start, complaining db
wasn't
accessible. An issue easy to solve in dev phase (you just delete
the data
dir and restart) but what happens if your business user wants to
keep audit
track?
Yes it is a fact ..
Maybe you have some alternate idea or experience to share?
You can use the same starting point of File and Jdbc Auditor by
extending
BaseSystemService (which gives you JMX exposition)
and implements ExchangeListener interface to be aware of message
exchange.
I had a quick look a this and in the last version (3.2.2) it seems
that JMX exposition is already present, there are just a few
modification to do in the applicationContext.xml and servicemix-
webconsole.properties to expose all these JMX stuff.
The point is that most interresting methods are just stubs throwing a
non-implemented exception and that I would like to fill the gaps to
make this work. Thus our business users would gain a nice execution
flow monitoring interface at a very fair price.
Maybe someone on the list has got any figures on the way the creator
of this nice tool would like it to be done. By the way, I also noticed
a Lucene entry point. Do these things could be combined? This way, one
would have best of both worlds, fast search capabilities and
enterprise class robustness.
Benoît
This is what I've done to implement my custom needs but we keep the db
storage as we are used to handle this.
Manuel
Benoît
Le 6 août 08 à 19:42, "Manuel EVENO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a éc
rit :
Can't you use the JdbcAuditor instead ?
Manuel
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Benoît Clouet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
wrote:
Hello and sorry for my previous mail I fired a bit too fast.
I would like to extend the FileAuditor in a way that would allow
it to be
re-used in the audit page of the servicemix web console. Does
anybody has
some ideas on the way t'on do it? Is there any documentation that
could
help
me to achieve this?
Thanks in advance for your ideas.
Benoît
