I've now tested following szenario:
servicemix-file --> servicemix-eip(static-recipient-list) -->
servicemix-bean --> servicemix-file
|
servicemix-file
But the same issue. I passing in a 50Mbyte file and there stay up to
280Mbyte in heap (see screenshot of jconsole). I attached my testcase so for
me it seems that we have a memory leak in the eip component or maybe another
class of servicemix.
My test enviroment:
Linux (Ubuntu 8.04)
Java: 1.5.0_15-b04
SMX: 3.2.2
Regards
/Steffen
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19933178/Bildschirmfoto.png Bildschirmfoto.png
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19933178/servicemix-bean-test.zip
servicemix-bean-test.zip
steff aka sid wrote:
>
> Ok,
> I've found out that the memory leak has nothing to do with my components
> and any other stuff I've postet before. I had something like:
>
> servicemix-file --> servicemix-eip(wiretab) --> servicemix-bean -->
> servicemix-file
> |
> servicemix-bean
> |
> servicemix-file
>
> So I think my usage of the wirtab at this place was wrong(?!) and the
> memory leak comes from the wiretab. All other components I tested but
> directly if I removed the wiretab the memory leak was gone. So my first
> understanding of the wiretab was more like a competing customers but I
> think this was a error in reasoning.
>
> Regards
> /Steffen
>
>
>
> steff aka sid wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I've got an performance issue. I have serveral beans which have to
>> process messages where the xml files are about 50+ MByte. Currently I'am
>> working with consumer bean instances which have an DeliveryChannel and
>> ServiceMixClient object. My problem is, that when I process one
>> message/file after that there where 300Mbytes staying in heap. So I did
>> some performance tests with netbeans and saw that there where much byte[]
>> and char[] objects (Not totally shure from where they come). After
>> starting SMX without doing anything my heap is about 20MByte. So I think
>> there must be some failure in my code. So I searched all created classes
>> found some failures but the problem doesn't disappear.
>> Then I found out that it is possible to call the close()-Method of the
>> DeliveryChannel and the ServiceMixClient Interface. So my question is do
>> I have to close them? Or Maybe is it better to create instances for my
>> bean class for each exchange (I think my solution is ok, because its
>> easier to handle multible calls).
>>
>> Regards
>> /Steffen
>>
>
>
-----
Brockhaus GmbH
COMPETITIVE THROUGH KNOWLEDGE
Web: http://www.brockhaus-gruppe.de www.brockhaus-gruppe.de /
http://www.brockhaus-group.com www.brockhaus-group.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-practices%2C-working-with-beans-and-huge-messages.-tp19914439p19933178.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
