Freeman- Is there a reason why SM's CXF component is not using the message from the underlying exception?
Thanks, Matt Pavlovich Freeman Fang wrote: > > Hi, > > You needn't setup it, the soap fault message your post is current > default behavior for undefined exception. > > Freeman > > mattrpav wrote: >> Is there a way to setup SM CXF to use the message of an underlying >> exception >> when SOAP Faults aren't explicitly defined? >> >> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";> >> <soap:Body> >> <soap:Fault> >> <faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode><faultstring>Fault occurred >> while >> processing.</faultstring >> </soap:Fault> >> </soap:Body> >> </soap:Envelope> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-and-undefined-SOAPFaults-tp20507469p21342417.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
