Thanks Chris for the detailed info.
We are currently thinking of using SMX4 for 2 reasons 1) Integrated JAAS
support and
2) Better way of deploying components
However I think a feature like distributed NMR-NMR bridge will help in
achieving the
location transparency between BCs and SEs
Kiran Ayyagari
Chris Custine wrote:
Hi Kiran,
There are a couple of things you can look at. If you are using SMX3 you can
look at the
JMSFlow<http://servicemix.apache.org/nmr-flows.html#NMRFlows-JMSFlow>which
does exactly what you want and uses ActiveMQ to acheive this. There
are some performance and architectural considerations with the JMSFlow and
Adrian Trenaman has a good blog entry about that
here<http://trenaman.blogspot.com/2008/11/jmsjca-flows-in-servicemix-wrong-level.html>
.
If you are working with SMX4 milestone releases then the only solution
currently is to use JMS endpoints or some other explicit connection to
bridge between SMX nodes. There is some work being done to support implicit
distribution in SMX4 similar to the JMSFlow functionality in SMX3 and I
think in the long term there may be some other options (such as using the
distributed OSGi spec RFC 119).
Hope this helps.
Chris
--
Chris Custine
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:44 PM, ayyagarikiran <[email protected]>wrote:
hello Guys,
Is there a way to form a bridge between 2 SMX instances without using web
services or any other external service?
Am currently looking for a feature like 'Network of Brokers' present in
ActiveMQ
P.S :- Initially posted the same on IRC but think all are busy with their
work :)
thanks,
Kiran Ayyagari
