Hi, When you say you swithch the Camel SA's from JMS to use JBI are you using JMS Flow...?
Can you also post a sample code (scrubbed if necessary) of what your camel SA's look like? This is unusual... While JBI is certainly less performant than straight JMS communication due to MEP conformance requirements,thereby increasing the number of interactions between service endpoints and consequently JMS payloads between components, it should not be as bad or come into play unless you use JMS flow. Can you please clarify? Cheers, Ashwin... GrkEngnr wrote: > > Hello, > > I currently have a configuration in which I have 2 camel SA converting > messeges and sending to a third camel SA. Currently we are using JMS as > the connection between the SAs, but when I switch in camel to use JBI, I > have horrible performance. JMS non-durable topic can send 10-12k messages > per second. When I switch to JBI between the 2 camel SAs, I get about 20 > messages per second. > > What am I missing? How can I configure the jbi for maximum throughput? All > service assemblies are running in a single instance of Servicemix. Can I > configure the NMR? (for instance are messages being persisted?) > ----- --- Ashwin Karpe, Principal Consultant, PS - Opensource Center of Competence Progress Software Corporation 14 Oak Park Drive Bedford, MA 01730 --- +1-972-304-9084 (Office) +1-972-971-1700 (Mobile) ---- Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JBI-performance-tp21615804p21632207.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
