Glenn,

I will try to put it in. Will contact you later on.

Lars



Glenn Macgregor schrieb:
> Does anyone know where/how Geronimo-javamail gets pulled in as a dependency?
>
> Thanks
>
>  Glenn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Macgregor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 02 April 2009 15:14
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: servicemix-mail fix
>
> I am very sorry to be such a pain...can someone please give me some help on 
> the servicemix-mail component?
>
> I have a new version of Geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8-SNAPSHOT.jar which 
> should fix a problem accessing an exchange imap server. I have installed that 
> jar into my mvn repository as described in other mails. Now I am moving on to 
> try to update the servicemix-mail pom.xml to use that version. I would assume 
> that Geronimo-javamail would be listed in the dependencies section but I 
> don't see it. The only reference to Geronimo is
> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec.
>
> Can someone please explain how Geronimo-javamail gets linked...if it 
> does...if not what mail API is actually being used?
>
> Thanks
>
>  Glenn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 02 April 2009 14:56
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: servicemix-mail fix
>
> Glenn,
>
> I don't know how you will perform your build but if you use the one of the
> SMX pom.xml file, you should be able to find the parent pom.xml where a
> section <properties> exist. In this section you can change the version of
> the dependency and start after your build.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Glenn Macgregor
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>   
>> I think this is going to be a bit more complex. I have the src for the
>> components and I have built all the components...specifically
>> servicemix-mail. After investigating the produced jar files I see that the
>> Geronimo mail stuff is not included in that jar file. How do I get the
>> servicemix-mail to use a different version of it's dependancies? Do I need
>> to make bundles out of the Geronimo stuff?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>  Glenn
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: 02 April 2009 13:38
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: servicemix-mail fix
>>
>> Glenn,
>>
>> You can during your test disable the other bundles using the command : stop
>> xxx where xxx is the name of the bundle where same classes are already
>> exported.
>>
>> charles
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Glenn Macgregor
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Charles,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. I don't think that will work because some classes
>>>       
>> are
>>     
>>> already deployed through other features/osgi bundles.
>>>
>>> Glenn
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: 02 April 2009 11:40
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: servicemix-mail fix
>>>
>>> Hi Glenn,
>>>
>>> If none of the classes mentioned in your email are already deployed
>>>       
>> through
>>     
>>> bundles top of SMX4, you can deploy the jar provide using the following
>>> command :
>>>
>>> install wrap:file:///c:/directorylocation/mail.jar
>>>
>>> This command will install your jar and generate the MANIFEST.INF required
>>> by
>>> OSGI to import/export classes, ...
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Glenn Macgregor
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I have been in contact with Rick McGuire from the Geronimo project. He
>>>>         
>>> has
>>>       
>>>> created a fix for an Exchange imap problem and wants me to test it. He
>>>>         
>>> has
>>>       
>>>> provide a single jar which contains all the classes from
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.mail, org.apache.geronimo.mail, javax.mail,
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.javamail and META_INF
>>>>
>>>> I assume I can not just install this jar into servicemix. What do I
>>>>         
>> need
>>     
>>> to
>>>       
>>>> do get this installed into SMX4 for testing.
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks
>>>>
>>>>  Glenn
>>>>
>>>>         

Reply via email to