No, it's not supported at this point. If you want to work on that, that would be awesome !
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 22:08, ObjectOrange <brian.tay...@softechnics.com> wrote: > > GNodet, does this engine support persistent subscriptions? If not, we would > like to develop it with the community. > > > gnodet wrote: >> >> I think it mainly depends on how you use ws-notifications. >> If your subscribers are JBI components, they will always >> be reachable (unless you manually stop the SU in which >> they are defined), so it should be safe. >> If your subscribers are external services (http for example), >> you may want to use PullPoints which should give >> you some persistence. >> A JIRA already exists for using durable subscriptions >> (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-417). >> Feel free to vote for it and/or provide a patch ... >> >> On 9/18/06, pradeep <pradeepzm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> http://www.servicemix.org/sm30ug/servicemix-wsn2005.html >>> >>> Subscriptions not being persistent is a serious limitation. When will >>> this >>> be fixed ? I think ws-notifications are not safe to be used for >>> production? >>> Can other users please share their experiences. Thanks. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/ws-notification-limitations-tf2290726.html#a6362005 >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/ws-notification-limitations-tp6362005p23175836.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
