Hi Vivan, Thanks for the response, I am looking into camel too. But not finding much documentation or samples, If you have some links for camel samples in servicemix , please forward .
thanks Brijesh N K Madesclair Vivian wrote: > > Hello, > > I don't understand your flow. (I barely do in email, it is hard to > transcript a flow with letter I guess) > > My advise to you : make a scheme with double arrows for InOut and simple > arrow for InOnly, you will see immediatly where is the inconsistancy. > > You can use an eip:asyncBridge to transform InOut to InOnly (synchronous > to asynchronous) then do your integration patterns, then use pipeline to > call InOut stuff. > > I am just starting to check Camel, so I don't really know if camel can > handle transformation from synchronous to asynchronous and back, but I was > told that eip is deprecated so you should use camel for everything else. > > Regards > Vivian > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : brijesh [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mardi 21 juillet 2009 22:43 > À : [email protected] > Objet : MEP exception > > > Hello , > > I have workflow as follows > > |-->smx-saxon > > |-->cbr-->static rcpt--|-->cxf-bc(provider) > externalClient --> smx-cxf(consumer)-->smx-eip| > | Above > workflow smx-cxf(consumer), is in-only(inOnly) parameter ie, asynchronised > webservice. But > cxf-bc(provider) has in-out parameter. This webservice is synchronised > webservice. Between I have eip configured to pass the message through > content based router and saxon transformation also. > > When I am executing this workflow I get the following error. > > illegal state exceptin use and in-Only MEP?? > > > > thanks & Regards > Brijesh N K > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/MEP-exception-tp24595416p24595416.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MEP-exception-tp24595416p24620093.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
