I was wondering if anyone could give me the use case/scenario where you would select osworkflow for executing a workflow in servicemix vs. using either static or dynamic routes with camel. It seems Camel is well integrated with servicemix and provides a significant amount of functionality so I would think camel is the standard. Assuming that is true, when would one choose osworkflow over camel?
I am considering an application that requires a workflow to execute several applications in sequence. I would wrap the existing applications as services in servicemix. Thanks for any comments/opinions. Lou -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-vs.-osworkflow-tp24686462p24686462.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
