I have another question that might help this problem. I was surprised when I got servicemix from the fuse distribution that I had only servicemix to run. Does this start activemq too by default? I see nothing in my process list that could be activemq...
-----Message d'origine----- De : Madesclair Vivian [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 10 août 2009 11:31 À : [email protected] Objet : RE: JMS - NoSuchBeanDefinitionException connectionFactory Or, could it be a jar to add somewhere? It is my first try with the JMS component on servicemix. -----Message d'origine----- De : Madesclair Vivian [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 10 août 2009 11:17 À : [email protected] Objet : RE: JMS - NoSuchBeanDefinitionException connectionFactory No worries, I felt that I was doing something strange... Actually it was foolish ^^ So I tried inside my provider, my file is like this : <beans xmlns stuff> <jms:provider service="routerRecherche:AsyncRechercheRequestJMS" endpoint="provider" destinationName="queue.recherche.Request"> <property name="connectionFactory"> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> <property name="brokerURL" value="tcp://localhost:61616" /> </bean> </property> <!--Configure maximum connections used by the pool --> <property name="maxConnections" value="1" /> <!--Configure maximum sessions per connection --> <property name="maximumActive" value="1" /> </jms:provider> </beans> But I am still getting the same error. I am currently investigating but no results yet. I am wondering what is this "bean named 'connectionFactory'" that smx is looking for. Because now, with your config, I have no more bean named connectionFactory. The bean has no name and is directly the value of the property. I found a problem similar to mine where the guy had a bean defined in his activemq.xml. I checked in mine, there's only a broker defined there. Anymore ideas are wecome ;) Best regard, Vivian -----Message d'origine----- De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi 7 août 2009 19:25 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: JMS - NoSuchBeanDefinitionException connectionFactory s/wan't/didn't/g :) Apologizes Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Sorry I wan't clear: you need to put the property inside the jms:provider. > > The connectionFactory is a property of the jms:property endpoint. > > Regards > JB > > Madesclair Vivian wrote: >> I still have the same following exception : >> >> ERROR - JmsComponent - >> org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error >> creating bean with name 'org.apache. >> servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsProviderEndpoint#0' defined in file >> [C:\Work\Fuse-ESB-3.4.0.2\data\smx\service-assemblies\E3-esb-dispatch-sa\version_10\sus\servicemix-jms\E3-esb-jms-queues-su\xbean.xml]: >> >> Cannot resolve reference to bean 'connectionFactory' while setting >> bean property 'connectionFactory'; nested exception is >> org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No >> bean named 'connectionFactory' is defined >> >> >> Here is my bean again for control, it seems odd to me to put all in a >> property. >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> <beans namespaces xxx> >> >> <jms:provider xxx /> >> <jms:consumer xxx /> >> <jms:provider xxx /> >> <jms:consumer xxx /> >> >> <property name="connectionFactory"> >> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> >> <property name="brokerURL" value="tcp://localhost:61616" /> >> </bean> >> </property> >> <!--Configure maximum connections used by the pool --> >> <property name="maxConnections" value="1" /> >> <!--Configure maximum sessions per connection --> >> <property name="maximumActive" value="1" /> </beans> >> >> If you ask something else before 6pm GMT+1, I will try, otherwise >> I'll search more into it on Monday. >> >> Thanks >> Vivian >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi >> 7 août 2009 15:44 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: JMS - >> NoSuchBeanDefinitionException connectionFactory >> >> Could you try this configuration: >> >> <property name="connectionFactory"> >> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> >> <property name="brokerURL" value="tcp://localhost:61616" /> >> </bean> >> </property> >> <!--Configure maximum connections used by the pool --/> >> <property name="maxConnections" value="1" /> >> <!--Configure maximum sessions per connection --/> >> <property name="maximumActive" value="1" /> </property> >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> Madesclair Vivian wrote: >>> Yes, I tried both this morning after your reply (what you advised, >>> didn't work, then went to the website, didn't work neither) >>> >>> So I was learning about spring and amq from the website you gave me >>> and some others. Could not make it work this morning. Sorry I did >>> not answer, I wanted to have significant things to say when I do. >>> finally, I got another task to do this afternoon (quite urgent, so I >>> forgot about the feedback), I don't know If I will be able to get >>> back to my ESB prototype before Monday. I'll keep you updated about >>> this, and ask for more help by then if I can't manage to find the >>> answer myself. >>> >>> Thanks for your consideration! ;) >>> Vivian >>> >>> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi >>> 7 août 2009 11:55 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: JMS - >>> NoSuchBeanDefinitionException connectionFactory >>> >>> Be careful, it's brokerURL (with URL in caps). >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> Hi Vivian, >>>> >>>> Try to replace the url property by the brokerUrl. >>>> >>>> I think that the documentation is not correct. Refering to the >>>> ActiveMQ >>>> documentation: >>>> http://activemq.apache.org/spring-support.html >>>> >>>> the connection factory expects a brokerUrl property and not url. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> Madesclair Vivian wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to use camel inside servicemix. So in order to send >>>>> message to camel, I used JMS queues. >>>>> It seems I am making mistakes in defining the JMS SU, because I am >>>>> getting this exception when deploying the SA on smx : >>>>> NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean named 'connectionFactory' >>>>> is defined >>>>> >>>>> Here is the bean from my JMS SU : >>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans >>>>> xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; >>>>> xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0"; >>>>> xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0"; >>>>> xmlns:amqpool="http://jencks.org/amqpool/2.0"; >>>>> >>>>> xmlns:routerRecherche="http://172.31.196.135:8192/jbi/RouterRecherche"; >>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0 >>>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/schema/servicemix-jms-3.2.3.xsd >>>>> http://activemq.org/config/1.0 >>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-4.1.1.xsd >>>>> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans >>>>> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd";> >>>>> >>>>> <jms:provider service="routerRecherche:AsyncRechercheRequestJMS" >>>>> endpoint="provider" >>>>> destinationName="queue.recherche.Request" >>>>> connectionFactory="#connectionFactory" /> >>>>> >>>>> <jms:consumer service="routerRecherche:AsyncRechercheRequestJMS" >>>>> endpoint="consumer" >>>>> destinationName="queue.recherche.Response" >>>>> connectionFactory="#connectionFactory" >>>>> concurrentConsumers="8" /> >>>>> >>>>> <jms:provider service="routerRecherche:AsyncRechercheResponseJMS" >>>>> endpoint="provider" >>>>> destinationName="queue.recherche.Response" >>>>> connectionFactory="#connectionFactory" /> >>>>> >>>>> <jms:consumer service="routerRecherche:AsyncRechercheResponseJMS" >>>>> endpoint="consumer" >>>>> destinationName="queue.recherche.Response" >>>>> connectionFactory="#connectionFactory" >>>>> concurrentConsumers="8" /> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <amqpool:xa-pool id="connectionFactory" >>>>> url="tcp://localhost:61616" /> >>>>> </beans> >>>>> >>>>> I am quite sure I am doing a beginner's mistake. Anyone has any >>>>> idea about it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Vivian >>>>> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax) BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net [email protected] PGP : 17D4F086
