Hi Guillaume Does that mean, that we cannot create new BC\SE and add it to the servicemix-web?
cheers Kaarthik gnodet wrote: > > It's up to you if you want to embed servicemix to use it as a tool > (like Mule for example) and rely on a static configuration file, or to > use it as a container (like a web container) so you can deploy > components / service assemblies at runtime. > This is the main difference between the two modes. > > If you look at servicemix-web (in the examples of the distribution), > you will find it. > It is named applicationContext.xml, but otherwise is the same. > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > On 4/28/06, devg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am new to servicemix (still trying to decide over Mule). >> >> My question: >> >> What is the advantage of deploying as a webapp over using servicemix >> standalone ? >> >> Also, where is the servicemix.xml file for the webapp? Doesn't it need >> one? >> >> Thnx >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-t1525873.html#a4144522 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-web.war-over-servicemix-standalone-tp4144522p25871204.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
