Thanks Johan for your answer. But I continue with my question about the difference betwen pipeline and enrichment, because enrichment do the same only that the In-Out MEP be used to add information to the content and pipeline doesn`t have this limitation, but only be a conceptual definition because as component in the In-Out transformer you can do wathewver you want, add, delete, sustitute information.
In other words, if you use the same In-Only MEP and the same In-Out MEP as transformation in pipeline or enrichment you must have the same result . Or no? Johan Edstrom-3 wrote: > > The Pipeline component is a bridge between an In-Only (or Robust-In- > Only) MEP and an In-Out MEP. When the Pipeline receives an In-Only > MEP, it will send the input in an In-Out MEP to the tranformer > destination and forward the response in an In-Only MEP to the target > destination. > > On Oct 17, 2009, at 1:27 PM, loboEsa wrote: > >> >> What´s the difference between eip:pipeline and eip:enrichment ? >> >> For me, both receive InOnly message then send to InOut service to do >> something and the response be sent as InOnly service to continue >> with the >> flow. >> >> Where am I wrong? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Pipeline-vs-Enrichment-tp25941125p25941125.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > Johan Edstrom > > [email protected] > > They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary > safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. > > Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pipeline-vs-Enrichment-tp25941125p25949090.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
