Ok, I think I'm a bite confused ... Where are the new OSGi components (or I think we call it bundle) ? Is it possible to use only OSGi (and just forget and throw away JBI) in the SM4 version ?
In a pure OSGi environnement, there is no more SU/SA ? just some bundles ? This was a little classpath issue. In my xbean.xml file, I use the xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"; namespace. In SM3, I don't need to add lib/spring-context.jar to the SU.jar. In SM4, I need to include the jar. Thanks for your time ! Raphaël. Le 6 janvier 2010 16:56, Grégory Le Bonniec <[email protected]> a écrit : > So if I understand, your advice is to use OSGi components. > > Is there a OSGi component collection available (like for JBI : cxf, file > ...) ? > > Regards > > Greg > > 2010/1/6 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > > Hi, > > > > it's already the case, the JBI components are shared between SMX3 and > SMX4. > > Normally, you can deploy directly your SA in SMX4. What issue had you ? > > > > Concerning SMX4, the JBI support is mainly for backward compatibility. > > For new users, it's better to directly use OSGi and you can use the > > EndpointExport to use JBI components from your OSGi bundles. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > Raphaël Delaporte wrote: > > > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Is it planned to migrate all the components from JBI to OSGi ? > >> > >> There is something which afraid me. I just find very few documentation > >> about > >> SM4. > >> And I've tried to run some SA which are working on SM3 but are not > working > >> on SM4 (missing jar files from classpath for example). > >> > >> > >> An other question : > >> Does ServiceMix4 support JBI only for backward compatibility ? > >> Or is it a real foundation for this version ? > >> Because it seems you encourage us to use OSGi, and not JBI. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Raphaël > >> > >> > >> 2010/1/6 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> > >> FYI, > >>> > >>> We are working on a new homepage to give more visibility to smx4: > >>> http://servicemix.apache.org/home2 > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Raphaël Delaporte <[email protected]> > >>> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:42:49 > >>> To: <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: ServiceMix 3 or 4 ? > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm wondering which version of ServiceMix I should use (SM3 or SM4) to > >>> start > >>> new project for production. > >>> > >>> I know the SM3 version is mature enough, has good examples, and stable. > >>> I guess the SM4 version is maybe a bit young. Very few examples, small > >>> doc... > >>> For instance, the web home page of the SM project is for SM3, not SM4. > >>> > >>> Am I wrong ? What are your opinions ? > >>> > >>> Thanks for your replies. > >>> > >>> Raphaël. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax) > > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader > > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net > > [email protected] > > PGP : 17D4F086 > > >
