Thanks for the quick reply. Still I have a small problem. When we create a Service Unit we use CXF binding component. How about the message transformation between service unit and CXF binding component? Is it happen through the NMR?
Freeman Fang wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't think you can really avoid going through NMR if you use SE-BC > architect with SMX3, which is defined in JBI specs. > But your NMR message payload may not use JBI wrapper, you can use soap > payload for your NMR message, this will save time to do the transform > between soap message and jbi message, you can add > useJBIWrapper="false" for your cxf bc endpoint. > > Or if you use SMX4, you can access the cxf endpoint deployed into > smx4 container directly using http osgi service(this is very similar > as access a standalone cxf endpoint through http transport), which BC > not get involved at all in this case, you may need take a look at the > cxf-osgi example shipped with SMX4 kit. > > Freeman > > On 2010-1-11, at 下午1:37, roshansn wrote: > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I need to create a binding component to expose a web service. But I >> am not >> willing to use cxf binding component that is already given. Because >> it will >> help to reduce performance of the system. (always go through NMR) >> Can anyone >> give me an idea to solve it? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Create-a-web-service-without-using-CXF-binding-componenet-tp27106112p27106112.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > Freeman Fang > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Create-a-web-service-without-using-CXF-binding-componenet-tp27106112p27106499.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
