I've this errors

INFO  - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Interceptor has thrown exception,
unwinding now
org.apache.servicemix.soap.api.Fault: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxEOFException:
Unexpected EOF in prolog
 at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,0]
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor.handleMessage(BodyOutInterceptor.java:41)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.core.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:85)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor.handleMessage(StaxOutInterceptor.java:50)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.core.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:85)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.DefaultProviderMarshaler.createMessage(DefaultProviderMarshaler.java:79)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsProviderEndpoint.processInOnlyInSession(JmsProviderEndpoint.java:561)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsProviderEndpoint$1.doInJms(JmsProviderEndpoint.java:531)
        at
org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate.execute(JmsTemplate.java:471)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsProviderEndpoint.processInOnly(JmsProviderEndpoint.java:542)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.JmsProviderEndpoint.process(JmsProviderEndpoint.java:499)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.doProcess(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:627)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.processExchange(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:581)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.onMessageExchange(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:535)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.SyncLifeCycleWrapper.onMessageExchange(SyncLifeCycleWrapper.java:60)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.processInBound(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:623)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.AbstractFlow.doRouting(AbstractFlow.java:172)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaFlow.doRouting(SedaFlow.java:168)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaQueue$1.run(SedaQueue.java:134)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxEOFException: Unexpected EOF in prolog
 at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,0]
        at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwUnexpectedEOF(StreamScanner.java:686)
        at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.handleEOF(BasicStreamReader.java:2134)
        at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.nextFromProlog(BasicStreamReader.java:2040)
        at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.next(BasicStreamReader.java:1069)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.util.stax.StaxUtil.copy(StaxUtil.java:195)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor.handleMessage(BodyOutInterceptor.java:39)
        ... 20 more

Raphaël


Le 19 janvier 2010 00:00, Raphaël Delaporte <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I've still have issue with the JMS and Camel component.
> I'm running on SMX 3.3.1, and the 2009.02 version for both JMS and Camel.
>
> I've this kind of route which is working (and useless by the way)
>
> <jms:consumer service="esb:jmsConsumer" endpoint="jmsConsumer"
>         targetService="esb:camelJBI" targetEndpoint="camelJBI"
>         destinationName="queue/in" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"
> />
>
> from("jbi:endpoint:http://esb/camelJBI/camelJBI";)
> .to("jbi:endpoint:http://esb/jmsProvider/jmsProvider";);
>
> <jms:provider service="esb:jmsProvider" endpoint="jmsProvider"
>         destinationName="queue/out" connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"
> />
>
>
> If I just change my camel route to this (just adding the camel log
> endpoint)
>
> from("jbi:endpoint:http://esb/camelJBI/camelJBI";)
> .to("log:myClass.class")
> .to("jbi:endpoint:http://esb/jmsProvider/jmsProvider";);
>
> It does not work anymore ... Is it a bug, or is it a MEP related ?
>
> Thanks.
> Raphaël
>

Reply via email to