Hi, We are in the process of migrating from SMX 3.2.2 to SMX 3.3.1, which comes bundled with 2009.01 components.
During our adaptation works, we have found some 2009.01 to be faulty (servicemix-camel and servicemix-cxf-bc), so we have upgraded them to their respective 2009.02 versions. My question is: Should we be cautious with any problems or conflicts that my arise from the fact of having two versions of servicemix-shared in place? (I believe 2009.01 components need servicemix-shared-2009.01 and 2009.02 need servicemix-shared-2009.02). Do we need to have both deployed on the hotdeploy folder? What should the structure be? What if we toss in some of the new 2010.01 components that are on the verge of being released soon? Many thanks! Raul. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Mixing-2009.01%2C-2009.02-and-2010.01-components-tp27925875p27925875.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
