Thanks, Freeman. But in your advice [1], it seems to get a problem within my case, I think, since the original service(cxf-bc1->cxf-se1) should not be affected by this combination.
In case of [2], it's not likely to apply to servicemix 3.X(only for the 4.X version of servicemix-saxon) although it's the best suggestion. Is it suitable to use a routing component(eip or camel)? Any alternative ways or advice for my erroneous understanding..? sic Freeman Fang wrote: > > Hi, > > My comment inline > On 2010-4-9, at 下午4:07, sic wrote: > >> >> I don't have much experience in cxf and webservice. >> >> I'm operating two simple webservices using cxf-bc and cxf-se in >> servicemix-3.2. >> And two of webservices are entirely different in terms of business. >> >> I really wonder if it is possible to make a combination of this two >> webservices. >> For example, cxf-bc1 -> cxf-se1 -> cxf-se2 then return through the >> cxf-bc1. > Yes, you can inject proxy of cxf-se2 to cxf-se1, then you can invoke > cxf-se2 from cxf-se1 just like normal java invocation, take a look at > "Proxies" part from [1] > > [1]http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-cxf-se.html >> or cxf-bc1 -> cxf-se1 -> saxon -> cxf-se2 and so on. >> > yes, I think so, take a look at "XSLT Proxy" from [2], this should help > > [2]http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-saxon.html > > Freeman >> regards, >> sic >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/combination-of-two-cxf-se-tp28188970p28188970.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > Freeman Fang > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/combination-of-two-cxf-se-tp28188970p28190632.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
