Geert Schuring wrote: > > Sounds like you shouldn't be using ServiceMix in the first place. are you > aware of Mule and Camel? These projects are more like what you describe. > Servicemix solves communication between components on a higher level > (JBI). > > Geert. > > Well, up to Servicemix3, you would be right, but the question is about Servicemix4.
Servicemix4's emphasis is on OSGi. OSGi can work very fast at low-level, fast communications. In my project we send around 50 messages/second using OSGi, Camel and ActiveMQ, using servicemix as the container. AND we have all the advantages of clustering, without using any JBI-compliant clustered endpoint. The trade-off is NOT using nmr and JBI endpoints to achieve speed. Clustering can be solved solely by using clustered ActiveMQ brokers as I said in the post before. On servicemix4, nmr / JBI endpoints / JBI clustering is possible, but it's for sure not the best way if you want speedy delivery. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Servicemix-4.2-clustering-issues.-tp28729394p28779069.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
