Thanks for that Fernando. I will try to take a look next week.
Regards JB -----Original Message----- From: Fernando Ribeiro <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:54:59 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: "Failed to resolve endpoint" on ServiceMix 4.2 I've created an issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3517 for this matter. Thanks. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Fernando Ribeiro < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you please help with questions 1 and 3? Thanks. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Fernando Ribeiro <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM > Subject: Re: "Failed to resolve endpoint" on ServiceMix 4.2 > To: [email protected] > > > JB, > > No problems, will actually blog about it next, just wanted to know if > anyone here can help me with the following questions about the issue from > the original discussion: > > 1. Is this the expected behavior, or should all components actually be > [made] available before any routes are built? Should it be reported as a bug > and/or an improvement? > > 2. I had worked around the issue by accessing the endpoint in Java code > (getEndpoint("restlet")), how does it work there? > > 3. How exactly does the import in question fix the issue? [it worries me > not to know if it ensures the component will be loaded before the route is > started or just launches before it]. > > Thanks, > > Fernando > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Fernando, >> >> thanks for spotting that, it can help Camel/ServiceMix users :) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 01/04/2011 05:53 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've found an interesting issue when deploying a route in ServiceMix 4.2, >>> which I discussed at >>> http://fusesource.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2493. >>> >>> The fix was adding an OSGi reference manually to the beans.xml file, >>> which >>> was awkward because I expected all components, for example, to be loaded >>> before any routes that use them to be started. >>> >>> If you prefer me to take this discussion to the ServiceMix mailing lists >>> instead, please advise. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Fernando >>> >>> > >
