Hi Linus,
Each instance is completely atomic. It means that if you deploy an
ActiveMQ broker is several instance, you should setup to use different
port number, etc.
On the other hand, you can share an unique broker.
In your case, I guess that you share the same broker between several
instance. Take a look on etc/activemq-broker.xml configuration to check it.
Regards
JB
On 06/21/2011 10:42 PM, Linus Brimstedt wrote:
Hello,
Im using child instances to keep different clients separated, but several
clients may use the same units.
What I didnt realize, was that activemq was shared between instances;
probably for a good reason.
But does this mean that i have to name the queues and topics dynamicly for
each instance?
I.e., if i just make camel route like from("activemq:queue:someName") and
deploy the unit in several instances, any instance may pick up the messages
sent from any instance. (rather than message put on queue X in instance A
only being picked up by units in instance A)
So, is there another way to keep messages separated within an instance other
than by naming (or like I did now: switch to seda)
/linus
