Stefan,

And what happens if you add servicemix-shared as a dependency instead?
 Anyway, the new exception is because you now have two instances of the same
class active - one that's living inside the SA and another one in the shared
library, so that's why you get this odd-looking exception.

One more question: what version of ServiceMix are you using?  If these is
just the default servicemix-camel component and a normal SU/SA, you
definitely shouldn't bump into this thing so we should try to figure out
what's wrong here to get it fixed.


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/


On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Stefan Essl <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gert,
>
> I get this within a servicemix-camel SU. If I add servicemix-soap2 to the
> maven dependencies, the SA deploys fine, but I get a really weird error on
> execution:
>
> java.lang.ClassCastException:
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.util.stax.StaxSource cannot be cast to
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.util.stax.StaxSource
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
>
> Am 26.10.2011 um 20:34 schrieb Gert Vanthienen:
>
> > Stefan,
> >
> > What JBI component is the SU that causes the exception using?  This class
> > should be part of the default servicemix-shared shared library (it's part
> of
> > servicemix-soap2 to be exact) that contains the code that's being used by
> > all JBI components so you shouldn't really bump into this by using just
> the
> > standard JBI components.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Gert Vanthienen
> > ------------------------
> > FuseSource
> > Web: http://fusesource.com
> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Stefan Essl <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> if I try to deploy my SA, I get the error:
> >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.util.stax.StaxSource
> >>
> >> I guess I'm missing some maven dependencies, but I can't work out which
> >> one...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stefan
>
>

Reply via email to