Hi Jean-Baptiste, Firstly, thank you for your quick answer.
I've got some new questions which came to my mind due to your answers : "Why don't you fire directly Camel route from Bonita ? I think that ODE is redondant especially with Bonita. More over the integration scenarii could be implemented directly with Camel. " In my mind, Bonita manage the main tasks and we would have implemented in ODE (deployed in SMX), for a given task, the thiner granularity i.e the sequence of webservice calls. 1. When you are talking about "fire directly Camel route from Bonita", you arenot talking to skip activeMQ but ODE, right ? you mean to skip the ODE part and directly implement the thiner granularity in Bonita ? But, by doing this, I would delete the separation between the user part, Bonita with the high level processes management (which is, for information, on a jBoss server) and the technical part (sequence of webservice calls) which was the initial goal at the beginning ? In compensation, would it improve significantly the performance to delete the ODE stage ? "More over the integration scenarii could be implemented directly with Camel. " 2. I don't get exactly what are you suggesting me here ? Without ActiveMQ, ODE and ServiceMix ? 3. In SMX 4, I don't manage to understand which server is used. I can find jetty file in the SMX_HOME directory... Karaf is launched on a jetty server ? And if we deployed application on ServiceMix (on the deploy directory), it is deployed on jetty too ? Is it a way to switch jetty by jboss (to deploy SMX and Bonita on the same server) ? Thanks for your time and your answers. It helps me to get me out of the woods :) -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Question-about-the-coherence-of-an-architecture-using-ServiceMix-4-4-tp5568411p5570382.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
