We did have to add javax.resource in as a bundle, too with this set
up.  Hope this helps!

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:50 AM, James Carman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> We created our own bundle that included everything we needed for IBM MQ:
>
>    <properties>
>        <ibm.mq.version>7.1.0.0</ibm.mq.version>
>    </properties>
>
>    <dependencies>
>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mq</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mq.commonservices</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mq.headers</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mq.jmqi</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mq.pcf</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>com.ibm.mqjms</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>dhbcore</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>rmm</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>            <groupId>com.ibm.mq</groupId>
>            <artifactId>cl3-export</artifactId>
>            <version>${ibm.mq.version}</version>
>        </dependency>
>    </dependencies>
>
>    <build>
>        <plugins>
>                <!-- Plugins for creating bundles for WMQ libraries -->
>            <plugin>
>                <groupId>org.ops4j</groupId>
>                <artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId>
>                <version>1.5</version>
>                <extensions>true</extensions>
>            </plugin>
>            <plugin>
>                <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>                <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId>
>                <version>2.3.7</version>
>                <configuration>
>                    <instructions>
>
> <Bundle-SymbolicName>ibm-wmq-bundle</Bundle-SymbolicName>
>                        <Bundle-Version>7.1.0.0</Bundle-Version>
>                        <!--
>                         | export wrapped contents: don't use
> Export-Package:* as this bundles everything on the classpath
>                        -->
>                        <_exportcontents>*</_exportcontents>
>                        <Private-Package>!*</Private-Package>
>                        <!--
>                         | each module can override these defaults in
> their osgi.bnd file
>                        -->
>                        <_include>-osgi.bnd</_include>
>                        <Import-Package>!com.ibm.*,*</Import-Package>
>                        <DynamicImport-Package>*</DynamicImport-Package>
>                    </instructions>
>                </configuration>
>            </plugin>
>        </plugins>
>    </build>
>
>
> The osgi.bnd file just contains:
>
> Embed-Dependency: *;scope=compile|runtime;type=!pom;inline=true
>
> So, you can actually do that in your pom.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Thorburn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> And a quick Google search turns up the following:
>> http://gnodet.blogspot.co.nz/2008/09/id-like-to-talk-bit-about-third-party.html
>>
>> That seems to apply to my situation, so presumably that's what I should do,
>> then? That is, one of: Include each JAR inside the component JAR, extract
>> the classes from the MQ JARs and add them to the component JAR, or
>> re-bundle the MQ JARs so that they're OSGi-compliant.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Thorburn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> So, I would like to add some libraries to ServiceMix in order to have
>>> a custom component make use of them. In particular, these are free
>>> (but not open) Java MQI jars from IBM Websphere MQ. As far as I can
>>> tell, they are not OSGi-ified, so do I need to - somehow - apply OSGi
>>> to them to make my component see them in SMX? Or can I get away with
>>> just making my component OSGi-ified? Alternatively, is there a way to
>>> bundle them all up inside a single archive (like a WAR)?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, my knowledge of OSGi is basically non-existent, so I'm
>>> not sure what I should be doing here...
>>>
>>> - Andrew

Reply via email to