Hi, very interesting idea! Would this mean bridging the Spring and Aries contexts ? I wonder what further implications this would have ...
Best Regards, Michael 2015-11-16 11:37 GMT+01:00 Sobkowiak Krzysztof <krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com>: > +1 > I like the idea. It would be nice when the spring stuff would work > together with blueprint. > > Regards > Krzysztof > > On 16.11.2015 10:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Good point Achim. Enhance Aries Blueprint to support Spring namespaces > and projects is actually a much better way. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 11/16/2015 09:54 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> Maybe we should try to make the spring stuff work better with Blueprint. > >> So what is the actual issue with spring namespaces in blueprint, if we > >> could mix both worlds better, we'd have a much better tradeoff. > >> Don't you think. And that would also be much easier to communicate > instead > >> of "oh, you want to do spring ... well first get a Pax-Spring-DM > proejct, > >> now try this and that" ... > >> regards, Achim > >> > >> > >> 2015-11-16 9:50 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > >> > >>> Agree, Pax Spring (or whatever) could make sense. Just wonder if a lot > of > >>> people would use it. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/16/2015 09:03 AM, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I'm not sure how many people need this, but it shouldn't be too > difficult > >>>> to take the Spring DM sources and adjust them for Spring 4? If many > people > >>>> need this and want to > >>>> volunteer perhaps it's worth to start a small project (PAX, or > separate > >>>> project in Github), which develops the Spring integration based on > Spring > >>>> DM code base. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Krzysztof > >>>> > >>>> On 16.11.2015 08:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Raul, > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't think just extending the version range should be enough as > the > >>>>> Spring API changed between 3 & 4. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, spring-* "project" should work in aries-blueprint in term of > beans. > >>>>> However, the namespace handler won't unfortunately :( > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/14/2015 01:11 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> spring-dm is dead, and the last Spring version supported is Spring > 3. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Yep, I know. I wondered if it would make sense to release spring-dm > >>>>>> bundles > >>>>>> opening the version range to cover Spring 4 – for folks how still > want > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> run this set up. I know there's no guarantee it'll work with newer > >>>>>> versions, but right now we don't even know. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Actually, the "replacement" of spring-dm is blueprint, so, just use > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> aries-blueprint. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is it possible to use Spring modules like spring-cache, spring-tx, > etc. > >>>>>> with a context loaded via aries-blueprint? This is the use case I'd > >>>>>> like to > >>>>>> cover. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>>>> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big > Data > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> Messaging Engineer > >>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect > Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) > Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/) > Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC ( > http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/) > > > 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/) >
