Hello. Thanks for your answer.
I've done some tests on SMX V 6.0.0, and it seems to wrork more or less as I'd like to. Here is the Spring context, that just build one service upon a bean. This bean uses use many injections and autowiring with other classes. The service interface is a Camel processor extension... Next, the Blueprint resolving the service, and setting a Camel context with a route that uses the processor. All seems to work, but I'd like to avoid the double declaration of the property place holder. Any idea ? Thanks again. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Mix-blueprint-and-spring-in-the-same-bundle-tp5723320p5723322.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
