My vote +1

And another +1 to Stanton Sievers: Both docs.opensocial.org and
shindig sites sends a wrong message:
* docs.opensocial.org site, still listing 0.8
* Shindig landing page telling that it implements 0.8.x and 0.9.x,

Cheers

2012/5/10 Stanton Sievers <[email protected]>:
> +1 on the vote
>
> Also agree with Mark that this should be cross posted.  At this point
> would we also be driving to deprecate those versions of the spec?  The
> docs.opensocial.org site, for instance, still has 0.8 listed in the
> "Archives" section.
>
> Thanks,
> -Stanton
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   Mark Weitzel <[email protected]>
> To:     [email protected],
> Cc:     [email protected]
> Date:   05/10/2012 06:36
> Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Removing the opensocial-0.6, opensocial-0.7 and
> opensocial-0.8 features from Shindig trunk
>
>
>
> +1 (non binding)
> I'd ask that as we do this we also take the following actions:
> Cross post on the spec list
> Setup a way to see who is using shindig
>  On May 9, 2012 9:18 PM, "Ryan J Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
>> To:     [email protected], [email protected],
>> Date:   05/09/2012 05:10 PM
>> Subject:        [VOTE] Removing the opensocial-0.6, opensocial-0.7 and
>> opensocial-0.8 features from Shindig trunk
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Shindig community,
>>
>> In preparation for next release I would like to ask for VOTE to remove
>> the support for  opensocial-0.6, opensocial-0.7 and opensocial-0.8
>> features from Shindig trunk.
>>
>> Removal of these features mean that no gadget can use API that defined
>> in OpenSocial 0.6 to 0.8.
>>
>> In addition I will add  opensocial-2.0 and opensocial-2.5 features to
>> indicate support for OpenSocial 2.0.0 and 2.5.0 specs
>>
>> -1 - Please dont remove them because I still need it for my environment.
>> 0 - Dont really care
>> +1 - Yes, go ahead remove them
>>
>>
>> All are encouraged to send their VOTE to show concern or support but
>> only PMCs votes are binding.
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> PS:
>>
>> Here is my vote +1
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
J. Félix Ontañón Carmona
Emergya Consultoría

Reply via email to