On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Christophe Lombart <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I'm +1 to see on of these solutions (dynamic group or acl scripts) inside > the Sling code base. We also need this kind of flexibility....
Same here, but I will insist on serious automated tests for this (*)...scripted ACLs are probably easier to abuse than coded access control, so we must be careful not to open a can of worms. -Bertrand (*) well this is not too different from my usual point of view ;-)
