Hi,

Carl Hall  wrote
> We (Sakai Project) are working to replace JCR with a non-JCR backend
> (Cassandra and any JDBC; our mail list details the reasons and factors).

I'm just curious, can you please give some direct pointers to the
discussion?

>  While this isn't JackRabbit -> ModeShape (staying with JCR will be much
> easier), we can certainly attest that changing the storage engine is
> possible with some work.  The Sling code does a great job of decoupling
> itself from the storage mechanism.
We have more features on our list for the resource resolver
(factory/provider) which would allow to create, update and delete
resources as well (I think there is a wiki page regarding this). So if
you need something in this area, maybe it's now a good time to address
these things

Regards
Carsten

> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Alessandro Novarini <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Fine for me, we should start working on the server bundle soon.
>> I'll let you know what our progresses are.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ale
>>
>>
>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Gunzenreiner Simon wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ale
>>>
>>> I posted this question originally. Just to give you an update on where we
>> stand - we haven't started this work yet, and it probably will be mid
>> January until we do. I suggest we share our findings on this list ...
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Alessandro Novarini [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2010 18:43
>>> An: [email protected]
>>> Betreff: Sling+ModeShape
>>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I've just subscribed because I would like to know if any progress has
>> been made on the replacement of Jackrabbit with another JCR implementation,
>> as discussed here:
>>>
>> http://dev.day.com/discussion-groups/content/lists/sling-users/2010-11/2010-11-16_Replacing_jackrabbit_with_other_JCR_implementation_Gunzenreiner_Simon.html
>>>
>>> I've tried in the last couple of days to work on it too, taking as sample
>> the org.apache.sling.auth.openid bundle, and I've had some hard time because
>> at the moment I have little knowledge of ModeShape; anyway, if there was the
>> will to work openly on the project, I would be glad to contribute in some
>> way.
>>>
>>> I don't have the original thread as email so sorry for not directly
>> replying to it.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ale
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to