> Cool. Beware there is currently a test failure which I am trying to fix. > But for your use case, it should be ok.
I skipped the test and so far I couldn't reproduce the error. Thanks, Markus >> >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Markus Joschko >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Obviously nobody has used esps in production until now? That should be >> >>> mentioned on the webpage clearly. So far I had the impression that esp >> >>> are somewhat the preferred template language. >> >> >> >> Well, depends ;-) I would say everyone has his/her own preference, Sling >> >> does not have a preference ;-) >> > >> > Preference in the term of: That's the language that is used most >> > often, for which patches are are released earlier etc. >> > This bug clearly shows that there is a preferred language (which is >> > JSP), even if officially there isn't. >> > >> >> >> >> But in our Day job some if not most of use mostly care for JSP, true. >> >> >> >>> Do you have a reference to the bug in the felix javascript >> >>> implementation? >> >> >> >> I am working on this as we speak. >> > >> > Any estimate on the fix? I tend to convert our esps to jsps now anyway >> > but if there is a quickfix, >> > I don't have to do this all at once. Thanks to possibility to have >> > different script languages running next to each other. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Markus >> > > > >
