Thanks, Justin. That could probably work. The idea here is that separate development teams will be working on what are effectively separate websites, but all deployed together in one server under separate context paths. So I'd like each individual site/team not to have to worry when binding items that they are using the same keys. And, of course, it would be good for requests only to execute the bindings they actually need, to save on overhead. So having the BindingsValuesProvider for each context path check the current resource for that path (e.g. "/foo/*" for FooBindingsValuesProvider, and "/bar/*" for BarBindingsValuesProvider) before binding anything should work.
--David -----Original Message----- From: Justin Edelson [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Edelson Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 4:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: BindingsValuesProvider David- I think you could do this, albeit in a slightly roundabout fashion. In your BindingsValuesProvider you can inspect the current resource and inject the appropriate values depending on the resource path. Justin On May 20, 2011, at 1:30 PM, "Levine, David" <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to answer my own question for everyone, it looks to me like the answer > is "no". It seems like the code I'm interested in is > SlingScriptAdapterFactory, and it doesn't currently look for any sort of > property along those lines. Since I've never worked directly on Sling code > before (I'm just a user of the code), I'm not sure how involved a patch would > be to handle the kind of situation I'm thinking about. It would probably > also involve changes to DefaultSlingScript and possibly other classes. I'll > forget about this for now. > > --David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Levine, David [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 12:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: BindingsValuesProvider > > I have a BindingsValuesProvider class to add my own objects. I'm using the > @scr.property name="javax.script.name" annotation to restrict it to being > called only for a specific scripting language. It works great. I've also > found no problem in having two BindingsValuesProviders for the same language > (both get executed). But is there a way to also restrict the bindings to a > specific URL prefix? I'd like to have one provider bind certain objects to > scripts run in one subtree in my site, and the other provider bind other > objects to scripts run in another subtree. > > Thanks, > --David > > > > ** > This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named > above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be > confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any > attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender > by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from > your computer system. *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.
