http://sling.apache.org/site/project-information.html
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Ranaudo, John <[email protected]> wrote: > How do I unsubscribe from this list? > > Thanks, > John > > > On Nov 9, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Justin Edelson wrote: > >> >> >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 09.11.2011 um 17:53 schrieb Justin Edelson: >>> >>>> >>>> I'm not in favor of abandoning the DavEx->Sling Auth integration this >>>> for two reasons: 1) as Carsten noted in one of his JIRA comments, >>>> there are browser-based DavEx applications which depend upon Sling >>>> Authentication to work seamlessly and 2) we lose out on the use of the >>>> AuthenticationInfoPostProcessor infrastructure. >>> >>> Agreed. Which I come to the same conclusion (not abandoning Sling's nice >>> stuff) >>> >>>> >>>> In addition, I suspect that while the requirements of the DavEx >>>> servlet with respect to Sling Authentication are not entirely unique >>>> and that *if* there are changes required in Sling Authentication to >>>> support the DavEx servlet will benefit other use cases. >>> >>> Well, there is a unique "feature" which is called "missing-auth-mapping". I >>> am not entirely sure, that I want to add support for such functionality. >>> Because in essence, this would just replace one "anonymous" user with >>> another one (with maybe the added functionality of being able to disable >>> that user...). >>> >>>> >>>> I'm convinced the problems are entirely solvable and I'm not ready to >>>> throw in the towel quite yet. I may change my mind :) >>> >>> Do we have something else (other than the missing-auth-mapping stuff) ? >> >> Tests :) >> >>> >>> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>>> >>>> That said, as a short term solution to the issue Markus is having, I'm >>>> perfectly fine with rollback SLING-2167, reapply the change described >>>> in SLING-2256, and releasing DavEx 1.1.0. >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The price to pay is, that authentication for this does not go through >>>>> Sling and does not benefit from Sling's central configuration and setup. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Felix >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Markus >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > > ________________________________ > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is > privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are > not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender > immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it. >
