Hi Carsten

I did this change:
https://github.com/retobg/sling-stanbol/commit/802bc84f5fbac081b911e6588a90b8de170c3974

Unfortunately the results are the same as before:
- the JerseyEndpoint gets configured at /
- The sling engine cannot start because / is already taken
- the JerseyEndpoint is reconfigured to run at /stanbol as per the
configuration

When stopping the app and starting it again things works.

Cheers,
Reto

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Reto,
>
> you can put config files into "src/main/config" in your launchpad
> project and these configurations are included in your launchpad and
> get applied on startup as soon as possible.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
>
> 2012/7/16 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>:
> > Thanks Carsten,
> >
> > Not sure what configuring like I do with bundles means. Could you give
> me a
> > pointer?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> if you provide your configuration through launchpad (like you do with
> >> bundles), the configuration should be installed as early as possible
> >> and therefore be available when your service is started.
> >> You could try fiddling around with start levels, setting the start
> >> level of a bundle depends on how you install it. Using the Sling
> >> installer, put it into a sub folder with the start level as the folder
> >> name, or if you use the bundle list, create a section with the start
> >> level.
> >>
> >> In general, the component you're using should cope with the
> >> configuration arriving at any time. For example, the component might
> >> be started before config admin or anything else is done in a different
> >> order than "usual". Or the configuration is changed. In OSGi
> >> everything is dynamic and can come and go, so implementations should
> >> handle this fact.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Carsten
> >>
> >> 2012/7/16 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>:
> >> > Hi Felix
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your reply.
> >> >
> >> > Normally when configuration is available before the component is
> >> activated,
> >> >> it is activated with the configuration. If the configuration only
> >> becomes
> >> >> available later, the component is potentially reactivated with the
> >> >> configuration (potentially because the component may be declared to
> take
> >> >> configuration through a modified method).
> >> >>
> >> > I guess the reason is that org.apache.sling.launchpad.installer has a
> >> > higher startlevel than the bundle being configured.
> >> >
> >> > Could you give me a hint on how I can increase the startLevel using
> >> rules?
> >> >
> >> > I've tried:
> >> >
> >> > rule "increase stanbol level"
> >> >
> >> >     when
> >> >         $bundleList : BundleList()
> >> >         $startLevel : StartLevel() from $bundleList.startLevels
> >> >         $bundle : Bundle(groupId == "org.apache.stanbol")
> >> >             from $startLevel.bundles
> >> >     then
> >> >         System.out.println("increasing:" + $bundle.getArtifactId()+"
> >> > original: "+$bundle.getStartLevel());
> >> >         $bundle.setStartLevel($bundle.getStartLevel()+10);
> >> >
> >> > end
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> > As a consequence my app [1]
> >> >> > doesn't work correctly when started the first time. From the second
> >> start
> >> >> > up it works correctly as it doesn't first start the component with
> the
> >> >> > wrong configuration.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is there a way to make sure the components aren't started without
> the
> >> >> > provided configuration?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, you can declare the component to require component. Such
> components
> >> >> are only activated once configuration is available. As soon as the
> >> >> configuration is removed, the component is deactivated.
> >> >>
> >> >> Look for the "configuration policy" attribute.
> >> >>
> >> > If I understand correctly this would require modifying the bundle
> >> > containing the component needing the configuration, in this project
> >> however
> >> > I would like to just distribute the existing bundles without
> >> modifications.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Reto
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carsten Ziegeler
> >> [email protected]
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [email protected]
>

Reply via email to