On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > That's probably useful, but calling this multi-tenancy support is > misleading IMO - as Julian's message shows, people would usually > expect much more from that, and it doesn't look like we're able to > provide that with Sling currently, by far.
indeed. this is not multi-tenancy support (unless you want to call sandboxing that). i see sling's (future) multi tenancy more geared around the friction-less separation of *configurations* (whatever that may entail), much like a sysadmin deals with tenants on a LAMP server. > My suggestion is then just to call this the Tenant API, and refrain > from speaking of multi-tenancy to avoid inflated expectations. It's > just an embryo of multi-tenancy. +1 dom.
