On 02.11.2013, at 08:38, Alessandro Bologna <[email protected]> wrote: > I am confused on how that could be implemented? How do you point a resource > tree to another, and make the contents of the tree the same minus the > resource type? I mean, that would be cool... I don't think the solution is > shared nodes though...
No, I meant a tree that would just include references (string path properties) to the original tree instead of copying everything. You still have to manage that tree yourself. It depends on how much custom management you have to do anyway in your business case (because of differences in the trees like ACLs, availability etc.) whether it makes sense to manage an active copy or a an automatic duplication via another resource provider (or other automatic solutions). Cheers, Alex
