Hey Stefan, Cool! Nice to know, thanks :) Will definitely do that then
Greets, Roy > On 23 Dec 2016, at 11:28, Stefan Seifert <sseif...@pro-vision.de> wrote: > > please note you can also mix sling mocks 1.x and osgi mocks 2.x if you are > using OSGi R6 in your application but still use an older sling version (e.g. > AEM 6.1). > > this talks lists the possible version matrix combinations > https://adapt.to/2016/en/schedule/unit-testing-with-sling-aem-mocks.html > > sefan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Roy Teeuwen [mailto:r...@teeuwen.be] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 9:12 AM >> To: users@sling.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Using OSGi Mocks with OSGi DS annotations >> >> Hey Robbert, >> >> Aha okey that explains it, I'm still on the 1.x branch for now! I will have >> to wait until I can do an upgrade to the new sling api, or maybe backport >> the functionality, thanks! >> >> Greets >> Roy >> >>> Op 21 dec. 2016 om 08:49 heeft Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> het >> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hi Roy, >>> >>>> On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 23:03 +0100, Roy Teeuwen wrote: >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> I am trying to use the osgi mocks in the following setup: >>>> @Component >>>> @Designate(ocd = ServiceImpl.Config.class) >>>> public class ServiceImpl implements Service { >>>> >>>> @ObjectClassDefinition >>>> @interface Config { >>>> >>>> String property() default "value"; >>>> } >>>> >>>> private Config config; >>>> >>>> @Activate >>>> public void activate(Config config) { >>>> this.config = config; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> Test class: >>>> service = context.registerInjectActivateService(new ServiceImpl(), >>>> "property", "some-value"); >>>> But I am getting the following exception: >>>> >>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: No matching activation method with name >>>> 'activate' found in class some.packagename.ServiceImpl >>> >>> (snip) >>> >>> Support for annotation classes as configuration was added with >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5327 >>> >>> which is part of OSGi Mocks 2.0.0 . What version are you using? >>> >>> Robert > >
