So I'm part of a team that I will characterize as being "highly resource optimized" We have an AppDynamics instance that we use to monitor the state of our instances as much as possible. One of the OOTB features is the ability to tie into JMX and present graphs and historical information on specific items.
We have a variety of business processes and functions in Sling that would be beneficial to us to monitor, and in particular graph, so that we can do intelligent alarming. Where we are having problems is that collection of state that would allow us to do intelligent monitoring. Example being submission processing. If the number of submissions each instance is handling falls below a certain threshold or increases beyond a certain number, it's an issue of concern, a warning. But certain days and a particular time, it's a situation where need someone looking at it immediately. Additionally having a value being returned would also allow us to track trends or unusual events in a historical manner so that we can hopefully identify issues before they happen. -Jason -----Original Message----- From: Georg Henzler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sling Health Checks Hi Jason, no it is not possible at the moment - but nobody stops you to make the HC component also provide an additional, custom MBean that shares some additional result properties of the HC execution to other services. In theory the HC result could be extended to allow for custom properties (that are then in turn exposed via JMX), but the idea behind the HCs is that due to the clearly defined result type (with a clear semantic for each status) consumers can easily decide whether an instance is healthy or not, additional properties might be confusing. Could you describe your use case in a bit more detail? Regards Georg On 2017-01-30 18:56, Jason Bailey wrote: > Anyone know if it's possible to use the Sling Health Checks to expose > a value via the MBean other than the ones explicitly defined in the > Result Object? > > Thanks > -Jason
