Hi Nicholas,
I'm reviving this thread as I have continued to experiment with pipes
(specifically version 3.1.0) but I am getting an error when trying to get a
reference to the Plumber service. I've tracked down the error down to the
class SingleComponentManager, line 277:
implementationObject = getComponentMethods().getConstructor().newInstance(
componentContext,
paramMap);
The getConstructor() method above is returning null which makes the service
unavailable to use. I was wondering if you have any ideas here.
Regards,
Carlos
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:45 AM Nicolas Peltier <peltier.nico...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would kindly disagree here on disqualifying pipes for *lot* of changes in
> the structures.
> I'd say that it's specifically better in those cases (It was first created
> for those), as you don't need the hassle of download / reupload and you
> don't have to mess around serialization issues.
>
>
> Le mer. 10 juin 2020 à 14:57, Daniel Klco <dk...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > I agree with Nicolas' approach, however it depends on the scale you're
> > attempting to make changes.
> >
> > If it's fairly straight forward such as resourceType/a => resourceType/b
> or
> > property mapping, Sling Pipes is a great solution. If you need to do a
> > *lot* of
> > changes to the structure if your content, you may be better to pull it
> > down, transform it offline and reload.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:51 AM Nicolas Peltier <npelt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > one approach (not saying it's the best, i'm the main maintainer of
> them)
> > is
> > > to use a handful of sling pipes [0] and script to kick them off, or as
> > > package hooks.
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > [0] https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/sling-pipes.html
> > >
> > > Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 23:55, Carlos Munoz <camu...@redhat.com> a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi Sling devs, I was wondering what the best approach would be to
> take
> > an
> > > > exisiting repository and making changes to the content structure in a
> > > safe
> > > > and repeatable way.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
