This all sounds great. It seems SOGo is making great headway. I think the ability to invite a group will be very beneficial. And the freebusy selection will help. However the one feature I would LOVE to see in this next release is the ability to see number of unread messages in sub folders via the web interface. Being that we will be deploying SOGo in the next few months and plan to stay strictly web based this is a must have feature. I know there is a feature request/bug report on this. -- Donny B. On Monday, June 14, 2010 02:43 PM CDT, Ludovic Marcotte <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > As some of you might have seen, we're getting close to a new SOGo > release - v1.3.0. So far, it features the following enhancements : > > * added support for the "tentative" status in the invitation responses > * inviting a group of contacts is now possible, where each contact > will be extracted when the group is resolved > * added support for modifying the role of the meeting participants > * attendees having an "RSVP" set to "FALSE" or empty will no longer > need/be able to respond to invitations > * added the ability to specify which calendar is taken into account > when retrieving a user's freebusy > * added the ability to publish resources to unauthenticated > (anonymous) users, via the "/SOGo/dav/public" url > * we now provide ICS and XML version of a user's personal calendars > when accessed from his own "Calendar" base collection > * events are now displayed with the coloured stripe representing > their category, if one is defined in the preferences > * the event location is now displayed in the calendar view when > defined properly > * added a caching mechanism for freebusy requests, in order to > accelerate the display > * added the ability to specify a time range when requesting a time > slot suggestion > * added a Ukrainian translation > * updated the Czeck translation > > and we still have some work to complete prior to the release: > > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/roadmap_page.php > > Also, for more than a year, we've been following closely the OpenChange > project (http://www.openchange.org). As you can read from the website, > it takes a different approach by providing an open source implementation > of the Microsoft Exchange Protocol. The OpenChange project made great > progress lately and it's now the right time to start looking at adding a > SOGo provider for it. > > The SOGo provider would allow any Outlook clients to talk directly to > OpenChange (without any additional plugins, since it would think it > talks directly to an Exchange server) which would then use SOGo's > business logic to handle the rest. Outlook users would then be able to > fully collaborate with there SOGo, Mozilla Thunderbird/Lightning, Apple > iCal and other peers. > > We've started discussions with the OpenChange team to deliver a PoC as > soon as we can so stay tuned for progress on this. > > As usual, your input is appreciated. > > Regards, > > -- > Ludovic Marcotte > [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) >
-- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
