... and a mapping against Database-columns like the other ldap-like named colums (c_cn etc.), so Constraints could be used with database auth, too.
Greetings, Martin Am 26.08.2010 um 02:43 schrieb Martin Lehmann: > +1 > > Group memberships for constraints would be really great. > Now, I've to set an ldap-attribute for every user and feature. > > Maybe you want for file a feature request for this: > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/bug_report_page.php > > Greetz, > Martin > > Am 25.08.2010 19:52, schrieb Daniel Berteaud: >> Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 16:32 +0800, James Andrewartha a écrit : >> >>> I'm in a similar position, except I wanted to not list certain users in the >>> address book. I just moved the SOGo users into a new ou=calstaff located >>> inside ou=People, and told SOGo to use ou=calstaff,ou=People as the search >>> base. By relying on the DIT structure it is a gross hack, but it works. >>> Other LDAP things still work fine because they default to search scope=sub. >> Unfortunately, I cannot move some of my users in a different ou as my >> LDAP database is auto-generated (I'm using SME Server distro, which is >> really great BTW). >> >> I think the only solution would be some changes in SOGo, and that >> constraints can use group membership in addition to simple LDAP filters. >> >> >> Regards, Daniel >> >> >> > -- > users@sogo.nu > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
-- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
