>> I know, I will get flamed right now, but please do not use gnutls. >> Google for i.e. OpenLDAP and gnutls and follow the comments from Howard >> Chu, then you understand me. Or at least dear SOGo devs: please do not >> drop packges for Ubuntu/Debian on inverse, so people can use the openssl >> variant. > > There is no need to flame people who raise valid concerns. I was > actually thinking about using NSS instead of GnuTLS, but I don't have > a very strong opinion about it. I did have some problems with GnuTLS a > few years ago, but those problems might have been solved and I don't > have experience with NSS to compare with. Do you (of anyone else on > this list) know of any potential problem with using NSS?
Sorry, I don't know about NSS (only name service switch ;-) ) Christian -- Roessner-Network-Solutions Bachelor of Science Informatik Nahrungsberg 81, 35390 Gießen F: +49 641 5879091, M: +49 176 93118939 USt-IdNr.: DE225643613 http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com -- Roessner-Network-Solutions Bachelor of Science Informatik Nahrungsberg 81, 35390 Gießen F: +49 641 5879091, M: +49 176 93118939 USt-IdNr.: DE225643613 http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
