Firstly this applies to all mails sent not matter the sender, but it might me some configuration problem with mail server. Take a look at the from field, in the header (original message is yours), it is the only one i find strange, the address has been prefixed with ?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNjaGlsZA==?=
Still strange though since when pressing reply-all butting it selects correkt to address it just doesn't populate the cc field Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: marcel.asio@dovecot_mailbox Received: from vizzini.inverse.ca (inverse.ca [67.205.85.245]) by tosh.redbet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C4A7A1363 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vizzini.inverse.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B0463026A; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at inverse.ca Received: from vizzini.inverse.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vizzini.inverse.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id s9JsMmm15JNS; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vizzini.inverse.ca (Postfix, from userid 111) id 4E364630257; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vizzini.inverse.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95836301D8 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at inverse.ca Received: from vizzini.inverse.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vizzini.inverse.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GHpcEXLMEbm3 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.aarboard.ch (mail1.aarboard.ch [178.63.70.139]) by vizzini.inverse.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789876301E0 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff99:200:6848:2658:af62:32ad] (unknown [IPv6:2001:41e0:ff99:200:6848:2658:af62:32ad]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.aarboard.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D48E9FA07C for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 16:39:52 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNjaGlsZA==?= <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2.105i Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [email protected] References: <2bb2-4dc16280-1-2e3d330@143413206> In-Reply-To: <2bb2-4dc16280-1-2e3d330@143413206> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010100090909090708050607" Subject: Re: [SOGo] Reply all Reply-To: [email protected] X-Loop: [email protected] X-Sequence: 5354 Errors-to: [email protected] Precedence: list Precedence: bulk List-Id: <users.sogo.nu> List-Archive: <https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists/arc/users> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe%20users> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe%20users> On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 16:39 CEST, André Schild <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 04.05.2011 16:27, schrieb Marcel Asio: > > Hi Christian, > > > > Yes I am sure I pressed the reply all button not the only one experiencing > > this behaviour everyone within our organization using it are. Also running > > version 1.3.6 installed using apt-get from this source: > > > > deb http://inverse.ca/debian squeeze squeeze > > > > This is a new install of sogo and reply all have not worked from start > For us with 1.3.6 the reply-all works as intended. > > Are the mail headers of the original mail perhaps "strange" in some ways ? > > André > -- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
