Voted too ... This is such a great tool. I CANNOT live without it. Hate to be stuck on TB3.1 for now.
Thanks for your support! 2011/8/25 Ludovic Marcotte <lmarco...@inverse.ca> > ** > On 22/08/11 09:39, Julian Robbins wrote: > > Ludovic : would you like to say something as to the timescale for > Thunderbird 5/6 support ? I know inverse is busy with the Outlook work too, > but I think letting us know your plans will help us all ... > > Here's my take on this. > > Porting the SOGo Connector/Integrator is generally not long. > > What's long is porting all the improvements we've done to Lightning. > > When we did the changes back in Lightning 0.9, we submitted all of them to > Mozilla for inclusion. Not all of them were included (lack of time from > their side). Our patches then bitrotted. > > When we ported them again to Thunderbird 3.1, we resubmitted patches but > again, not all of them were included and they bitrotted again. > > We're now pretty much down to three patches to be included so we don't have > to modify Lightning again. Those are: > > 1. refresh killer: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502936 > 2. offline mode support: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380060 > 3. hooks / stubs mechanisms: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586276 > > The last one will allow us to move our ACL code directly in the SOGo > Connector/Integrator extensions. So we won't have to modify Lightning > anymore. > > That being said, those 3 bugs should be fixed for Lightning 1.0. You should > all vote on the bugs so the patches finally get included. > > Lightning 1.0 will most likely require Thunderbird 7. If that's the case, > that's the version we'll support after 3.1. > > Regards, > > -- > Ludovic marcottelmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) > > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
