On 2011-12-12 09:40, Christian Mack wrote: > On 2011-12-09 18:06, Stéphane GAUDICHE wrote: >> Le 09/12/2011 10:22, Christian Mack a écrit : >>> On 2011-12-09 09:14, Stéphane GAUDICHE wrote: >>>> Hi there, >>>> i find fatal error in my logs >>>>> Nov 25 08:38:14 sogod [9931]: <0x0x1f26dc20[GCSFolder]> >>>>> ERROR(-[GCSFolder writeContent:toName:baseVersion:]): cannot insert >>>>> content : <PostgreSQL72Exception: 0x1f26a360> >>>>> NAME:PostgreSQL72FatalError REASON:fatal pgsql error >>>>> (channel=<0x0x1ee91a20[PostgreSQL72Channel]: >>>>> connection=<0x0x1efc2860[PGConnection]: connection=0x0x1ee91af0>>): >>>>> ERREUR: valeur trop longue pour le type character varying(255) >>>> is it important? >>>> What is "valeur trop longue pour le type character varying(255)"? >>>> could it be fix? >>>> >>> My french isn't that good, but it means you try to insert a value which >>> exceeds the maximum length of the corresponding field of 255 characters. >>> >>> You can fix it, by enlarging this field or by not inserting greater >>> values :-) >>> >> >> My question is where come from this error? >> Does SOGo allowed to insert illegal values in database? >> > > See Bug #27 > "It seems that SOGO accepts adressbook entries that are too big for > postgres" > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=27 > > You can check this, by looking at the postgres logs. > This error should be logged there with additional infos.
Forgot to mention Bug #1339 "When a photo is attached to a contact on the iPhone" http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1339 Which is similar. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Gruppe Informationsdienste Rechenzentrum Universität Konstanz -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
