Hi, this behavior should definitely be configurable! 14000 entries are nothing nowadays for DBs. We handle millions of production values in DBs. Where is the difference in having 14000 entries in relational DB or LDAP (ok, LDAP is more annoying to handle ;-)?
Does SoGo only run in Germany such that it is enforced by law? I definitely vote for this setting being configurable! Best regards, Matt Am 24.08.2012 13:51, schrieb Christian Mack: > Hello Gábor Szittner > > > On 2012-08-24 12:55, Gábor Szittner wrote: >> On 2012.08.24., at 12:29, Christian Mack <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 2012-08-24 09:28, Gábor Szittner wrote: >>>> From FAQ: "The entries of a shared addressbook are not displayed by >>>> default as they are connected to a LDAP directory which can have >>>> thousands of entries." I have only 60-70 entries. I dont find any >>>> settings, how could I change that default behavior? Or any other >>>> suggested solution to have shared address book? (for example sync to >>>> mysql backend) >>>> >>> You can currently not change this behaviour. >>> >>> >>> BTW >>> This is also relevant for data privacy protection laws at least in Germany. >>> >> Thanks for your answer. I wanna make global address book, what is read-only, >> contain all workers, and visible in outlook. The last is the hardest. >> I try with carddav, outlook could sync via iCal4OL, but I dont find any >> solution to make a global shared address book, I'm giving up. >> >> I dont understand what would change the data privacy, you can list all ldap >> entries with search "." already. >> > No, you can not. > There is a limit set via "SOGoLDAPQueryLimit" per domain (or complete > system). This limits the maximum hits retrieved from LDAP for every search. > On our server this is set to 25 (we have more than 14000 users). > > > Kind regards, > Christian Mack > -- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
