ignore my last number 2. --force-conflicts worked out. So I will try and go ahead with it all.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Netwo Dist <netwod...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. Experts from #linux and #ubuntu say that it is not good to force > samba4-clients - might be a problem in the future > 2. There is not such switch like --force-conflicts in dpkg on Ubuntu 12.04 > LTS > > I came such a long way here, i want to move on. And I believe people are > piling up in queues behind me. > > Please help. > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Netwo Dist <netwod...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thank you. Well, whatever the previous samba versions are I do not want >> to know anything about them, I do not and will never have them installed. >> Only samba4 on my server. So that's ok then I will ignore them. >> >> acl_xattr.so is only necessary for file sharing - well, I do want file >> sharing. Didn't quite understand this line? It's optional for file sharing >> since you said to ignore this msg even if I use file sharing. >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Christian Mack < >> christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote: >> >>> Am 2013-02-11 11:09, schrieb Netwo Dist: >>> > I thought this installation is tested to work as sogo install docs say? >>> > It all means I can not use your software, can :( >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jean Raby <jr...@inverse.ca >>> > <mailto:jr...@inverse.ca>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 13-02-10 6:13 PM, Netwo Dist wrote: >>> > > Okay, thank you, thats shall sort smbclient issue. >>> > > But how about the more important one above with acl_xattr.so ? >>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696838 >>> > > >>> >>> Did you read that bug report? >>> >>> It says: >>> "The vfs modules aren't used by the ntvfs file server that the Samba 4 >>> package uses at the moment. The warnings during provision are spurious >>> and shouldn't happen. That said, while we could fix those warnings to no >>> longer occur, we really should move over to the main Samba file server >>> ("smbd") once it is updated to a recent upstream version. >>> >>> We shouldn't include the vfs modules in the samba 4 package - they're >>> already (albeit an older version) included in the 'samba' package and >>> they're not actually necessary for the current samba4 file server. >>> " >>> >>> I read this as: >>> This ony occures spurious. >>> And this acl_xattr.so is only necessary for file sharing. >>> And this error message can be ignored even if you use that. >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Christian Mack >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Mack >>> Gruppe Informationsdienste >>> Rechenzentrum Universität Konstanz >>> -- >>> users@sogo.nu >>> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists >>> >> >> > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
