On 06/19/2015 02:26 PM, Steve Ankeny wrote:
Rowland Penny recreated my problem in a VM (similar to my setup)
here's the content of his e-mail --
OK, there appears to be something wrong with the inverse samba
packages, I created a VM, installed latest Ubuntu 14.04 server,
updated this, installed samba:
apt-get install samba samba-common samba-common-bin samba-dev
samba-dsdb-modules samba-libs samba-vfs-modules smbclient winbind
python-samba libnss-winbind libpam-winbind libsmbclient libwbclient0
didn't do anything else except added:
deb http://inverse.ca/ubuntu-nightly trusty trusty
To /etc/apt/sources.list
ran 'apt-get update' and then 'apt-get upgrade'
This lead to:
The following packages have been kept back:
libldb-dev libldb1 libnss-winbind libpam-winbind libsmbclient
libwbclient0
linux-generic-lts-utopic linux-headers-generic-lts-utopic
linux-image-generic-lts-utopic python-ldb python-samba samba
samba-common
samba-common-bin samba-dev samba-dsdb-modules samba-libs
samba-vfs-modules
smbclient winbind
The following packages will be upgraded:
libparse-pidl-perl libtalloc-dev libtalloc2 libtdb-dev libtdb1
libtevent0
python-talloc python-tdb tdb-tools
9 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 20 not to upgrade.
Need to get 468 kB of archives.
After this operation, 253 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Installed the packages and then ran 'apt-get update' and then 'apt-get
upgrade' again
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libldb-dev libldb1 libnss-winbind libpam-winbind libsmbclient
libwbclient0
linux-generic-lts-utopic linux-headers-generic-lts-utopic
linux-image-generic-lts-utopic python-ldb python-samba samba
samba-common
samba-common-bin samba-dev samba-dsdb-modules samba-libs
samba-vfs-modules
smbclient winbind
0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 20 not to upgrade.
I 'think' I could probably force the upgrade with 'apt-get
dist-upgrade', but I also think I wouldn't be running Trusty any more
due to the installation of the Utopic kernel.
therefore, Inverse packages *must* be borked, if they will not cleanly
upgrade standard distro packages.
Rowland
I think the Samba mailing list has gone the second mile in trying to
help me upgrade Samba.
I'm needing a resolution from Inverse or an alternative source for the
Samba packages.
thx
(I'm patient! I know it's the weekend.)
understanding that I'm ignorant of the build process used by Inverse . . .
However, could it be the Inverse packages were built on a system with a
different kernel?
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
