On 18/09/15 12:41, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
> On 18/09/2015 04:24, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
>> So, what do you think? Does it make sense to work on a port for version
>> 2 or would it be better to start porting version 3?
> The efforts in porting v2 will be 100% reusable for v3. On the
> "backend", not much has changed (and certainly not packaging wise)
> between v2 and v3. The CSS/JS files and templates are completely new,
> but these are just static files when it comes to packaging.
OK. This is great news.
I'm still struggling with the problem I described in my initial mail though.
--
Niklaas
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
